EURA 2021
Contradictions Shaping Urban Futures
6-7 May 2021
Oslo, Norway (online)EURA 2021 was an online event hosted and organized by the organized by OSLOMET, University of OSLO, and The Oslo School of Architecture
Due to the corona virus outbreak in March 2020 and the development of the pandemic, the EURA 2020 conference in Oslo was cancelled. The conference received a lot of papers, especially within Track 2: Sustainable vs unsustainable urban development and growth vs degrowth. This has inspired the local organisers to find an alternative way of arranging Track 2 of the conference to present and discuss the engaging papers that were proposed in 2020.
In this online event, we explored how contradictions related to sustainable vs. unsustainable urban development and growth vs degrowth, are shaping our cities. The contradictions are not fixed, but intersect and are contested among actors who seek, in their own ways, to shape their city.
Participation in the conference was free of charge and open for a wide audience, who register beforehand, organized as a Zoom webinar.
Topic:
Contradictions Shaping Urban Futures
At a time when an increasing share of the global population is living in urban areas, there is a need to re-examine the role(s) cities take in coping with contemporary challenges and contradictions. The EURA conference takes as its inspiration Robert A. Beauregard’s book (2018) ‘Cities in the urban age’ as well as increasing polarizations and protests in cities, accelerated by the pandemic, where different groups take to the streets to make their voice heard. Both the book, the protests and the ongoing pandemic underline that urban policies and issues matter, have impact beyond the urban sphere and are worth fighting over. With this starting point, the EURA conference seeks to focus on contradictions that are generative for urban life, and thus contributes in shaping urban futures.
Although cities are facing many of the same contradictions, they are recognized, problematized, politicized and handled in different ways, and consequently also exert differing influences on urban life. Rather than focusing on how visions about urban futures are driving our cities, the objective of EURA 2021 is to better understand underlying contradictions that affect how the urban visions are materialized. Depending on political visions for a sound city and the power balance between urban actors, contradictions nurture urban development in different ways, benefiting some interests and groups, while possibly excluding and worsening the situation for others.
Keynote Speakers:
Robert Beauregard, Professor Emeritus at Columbia University
In his key-note speech, Beauregard elaborated on the importance for understanding the dynamics of underlying urban contradictions when trying to make sustainable urban policy. For Beauregard, the city is a cauldron of haunting contradictions. He argues that only by recognising the urban ambiguities and contradictions, can we begin to understand our moral obligations as well as possible paths towards equality, justice and peace in urban settings.
Ayona Datta, Professor in Urban Geography at University College London
Ayona’s keynote was titled ‘The distant-time of the future city’.
Parallel Sessions:
Sustainable vs unsustainable urban development and growth vs degrowth
Track Chairs:
Gro Sandkjær Hanssen, Research Professor NIBR, OsloMet
Per Gunnar Røe, Professor, Dep. of Sociology and Human Geography, Univ. of Oslo
Marta Lackowska, University of Warsaw, Poland
The Track:
Sustainable urban development models, strategies, policies and tools are operating in nearly every geographical and political context around the world. Urban spatial development and growth measures of cities are essential as they influence economic performance, public health conditions, and determine social cohesion and segregation. These measures vary widely in different geographical contexts as regards available approaches, policy instruments and forms of implementation. Compact city policies, for instance, focus on reducing the negative impacts of urban development on the surrounding environment, while green cities place emphasis on green infrastructure and local self-supply within cities themselves. Differences in policy interventions and planning practices are largely due to the miscellaneous drivers that urban regions experience today: multi-locality of live-work arrangements, migration, economic pressures, concentrated growth and transport challenges.
EURA Conversations (round table):
The generative potential of urban contradictions – growth vs. degrowth
In this conference we have explored the role of contradictions in shaping urban futures, with specific focus on contradictions between sustainable and unsustainable development, and growth vs. degrowth. In this final panel discussion, summing up the conference as a whole, we will start by zooming in on some of the contradictions in the growth vs degrowth debate. This will be the starting point for discussing more broadly how (and if) contradiction may provide a generative potential that enables us to develop alternatives to the status quo in the search for more social and ecologically just urban futures.
Participants:
Ayona Datta, University College of London
Karen O’Brian, University of Oslo
Hugh March Corbella, Universitat OBerta de Catalunya
Cecilie Sachs Olsen, NIBR (moderator)
Organisation:
Local Team:
Per Gunnar Røe, Dep. of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo
Susanne Søholt, Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
Gro Sandkjær Hanssen, Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
Lisbeth Harboe, Institute of Urbanism and Landscape, The Oslo School of Architecture and Design - AHO
International Team:
Valeria Fedelli, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Karsten Zimmerman, Technical University of Dortmund, Germany
Marta Lackowska, University of Warsaw, Poland
Ignazio Vinci, University of Palermo, Italy
Paula Russell, University College Dublin, Republic of Ireland